Thursday, February 09, 2012
   
Text Size
Chris D

Chris D

Website URL: E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

Monday, 14 December 2009 16:00

The World Wants a Real Deal

Aurora Conley is a 25 year-old Ojibwe native from Bad River, Wisconsin. A local leader, she is studying to become a solar panel installation trainer for other Native Americans, and has worked with former Vice Presidential candidate Winona LaDuke through the environmental organization Honor the Earth. At the 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen this week, she has taken her leadership global.

On Saturday, she walked at the leading edge of a 100,000 person march through the streets of Copenhagen—the largest climate mobilization in history, by many estimates—carrying a banner that said “The World Wants a Real Deal” with other indigenous people. On Wednesday, she spoke at a press briefing on behalf of the International Indigenous Peoples Forum on Climate Change.

“It was really imperative that we were at the front lines of the march, and that we’re at the front lines of the climate movement,” Aurora said. “Indigenous peoples are the ones most impacted by climate change and the practices causing it. Our cultures and traditions are the ones that are dying first.” When asked for examples of these impacts, she speaks of close native friends who have developed cancer due to suspected exposure to toxic oil sand mining residues.

Aurora, like us, is in Copenhagen as one of twelve Midwestern young people attending this Conference of the Parties (COP 15) through the Will Steger Foundation and Stonyfield Farm Expedition Copenhagen program. The Expedition is a project of the Will Steger Foundation, established by polar explorer Will Steger in 2006 to teach people about climate change’s consequences and the solutions that can be used to overcome it. Like all of us on this Expedition, Aurora is using her time here to connect people in her community back home with this year’s historic deliberations at COP 15.

We and our colleagues on the Expedition hail from seven states in the Upper Midwest: Michigan, Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Iowa, North Dakota, and South Dakota. We came to this conference in recognition of the fact that our region’s voice matters greatly on climate change. The Midwest contributes 20% of the greenhouse gas emissions produced each year in the United States, due largely to its dependence on coal-fired electricity. The region is also home to some of the U.S. Senate’s most critical swing votes on climate and energy—moderate Democrats like Kent Conrad of North Dakota and Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, who understand the threat of climate change but fear what a cap on carbon might do to the farming and manufacturing sectors in their economically troubled states.

We came here for another reason, too: climate change, and America and the world’s response to it, matter tremendously for the Midwest. Warmer winters are providing our states with less and less accumulated snowfall each year, hurting winter tourism revenues and causing Great Lakes water levels to drop. Heat waves, like the one that killed 600 Chicagoans in 1995, are projected to become deadlier and more frequent as temperatures rise. The list of impacts goes on. By dealing with climate change proactively, Midwestern states can find opportunity amidst the crisis. Our region has more natural wind energy potential than any other in the U.S., and a wealth of skilled workers, engineers, and manufacturing infrastructure that we can use to lead the world in producing renewable energy systems.

We came to Copenhagen, in short, to tell the world what the Midwest has to lose, to gain, and to offer in this December’s historic effort to respond to the climate crisis. But we may have underestimated the true stakes of the challenge. In our interactions with other young people from around the world, we have heard human accounts of climate change’s impacts. The power of these stories cannot be felt from the sorts of figures and statistics we read through in preparing for this conference.

A boy from Bangladesh told us earlier this week about becoming homeless after a typhoon destroyed his village and split his family apart.

A young man from Nairobi spoke about the four-year drought that is underway in Kenya right now. It is the longest drought anyone, even elderly people, can remember; crop yields have dropped off dramatically, and pastoralists are watching helplessly as their livestock die.

A boy from the Maldives, a low-lying island chain in the Indian Ocean that will be washed away if sea levels rise much more than a meter, said that if his President signs a bad climate treaty, it will be like signing a suicide pact for his country.

Over these past two weeks, more than 2,000 young people from around the world have participated in COP 15. Our common commitment to securing a fair, ambitious, binding international climate treaty has given us and the other Will Steger Foundation delegates strength. For youth like Aurora Conley, who hails from an environmentally impacted community, this has been especially true.

But our experience has also reminded us of the massive responsibilities we face as Americans, and as Midwesterners. We have heard that the world is waiting for the United States to lead. We have heard that President Obama is waiting for the backing of Congress. We have heard that it is our Midwestern Senators who must give Obama this sign. We have heard what is at stake. We now return to the United States saying, “We must act”. Our states will determine how the rest of the world will view the United States on this issue of climate change for history. When we return to the United States over the next few days, we will be exhausted from two weeks of hard, constant work. But our resolve to work with our Senators for a just response to climate change will be fresher than ever.

Wednesday, 06 January 2010 17:05

Thoughts on the COP 15 Summit in Copenhagen

Contents:

  1. What was this conference, and why did it get so much attention?
  2. What actually happened at COP 15?
  3. What comes next?

I. What was this conference, and why did it get so much attention?

It was the 15th Conference of the Parties (COP 15) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). In order to understand why this was important, and why it got so much attention in the media and elsewhere, you have to know the back story.

The UNFCCC

The UNFCCC is an international environmental treaty that was agreed upon in 1992 at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, known as the “Earth Summit,” in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The Parties to this treaty (that is, the countries that have formally endorsed it) have been holding annual meetings since 1995. There are now 194 Parties that have formally endorsed the UNFCCC—which is nearly all of the world’s 203 sovereign states.
Although the UNFCCC is technically considered a “treaty,” it’s most accurate to think of it as an “agreement to agree” to take action steps that prevent the worst impacts of climate change. Nothing in the UNFCCC itself requires countries to take such action steps. That’s why there have been fifteen UNFCCC conferences since 1995: the world still has a lot to do before it will have a global agreement that stands a chance of dealing adequately with the threat of climate change.

The Kyoto Protocol

The Kyoto Protocol, forged in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, is the world’s first and so far only attempt at a global agreement to address climate change. It calls for mandatory cuts in greenhouse gas emissions from developed countries, but exempts developing countries—including China and India, which are the world’s first and fifth largest emitters of greenhouse gases despite their status as developing countries. Because of this, the U.S. has never ratified the Kyoto Protocol, which means that the binding emissions cuts accepted by every other developed country (except Australia, until it ratified the Protocol in 2007) do not apply here, although the U.S. is the world’s second largest emitter of greenhouse gases after China.

The fact that three of the world’s five largest emitters of greenhouse gases are not bound to cut their emissions under the Kyoto Protocol has made this agreement inadequate to deal with climate change--though it has led to meaningful emissions cuts in most developed countries that ratified it (with some important exceptions).

Tuesday, 22 December 2009 09:43

Climate Justice Fast

This past Thursday, one day before the end of the 2009 Conference of Parties (COP 15), I fasted to help call attention to the great injustice of global climate change. Greenhouse gas emissions, which come disproportionately from people in industrialized countries, are imposing serious climate impacts on the rest of the world--droughts and desertification in places like the Horn of Africa, and crop-destroying floods in places like Bangladesh. By emitting like we do, we are depriving people in vulnerable places everywhere of food and other basic means of survival. Forgoing food voluntarily for a day was a small and completely inadequate token of my care for these impacted people.

But I was not the only one fasting. I was joined by hundreds of other temporary "solidarity fasters" from around the world, including fellow Will Steger Foundation delegate Holly Jones, and a brave team of eight long-term hunger strikers and organizers, who created the Climate Justice Fast campaign earlier this year.

I met one of the co-founders of Climate Justice Fast last year when we were in Poznan, Poland for COP 14. She is a 24 year-old Australian named Anna Keenan. Anna's capacity to sacrifice for just climate solutions was evident then as well--the two of us stayed up together at a print shop until four in the morning one night making placards that read "Survival," which we then handed out to official country negotiators for them to place on their desks during the plenary session. This effort, together with a wider coordinated campaign, yielded enough interest in the principle of "Survival" among the negotiators that the chair of one ministerial roundtable inserted a reference to "safeguarding survival of the most vulnerable countries and people" into her Conference summary.

Despite occasional victories like the "Survival" campaign, which originated with a team of youth climate activists and negotiators from small island states, the pace of progress in the UNFCCC has been depressingly slow. The apparent failure of traditional advocacy efforts compelled Anna and Sara Svensson, co-organizer of Climate Justice Fast, to try a more serious approach.

At the end of the UNFCCC's Barcelona negotiating round this past November, during which a bloc of African delegates walked out of the conference center in disgust with industrialized countries' unwillingness to commit to adequate mitigation targets, Sara, Anna, and their team stopped eating, drinking only water, and committed to continue their fast until the world agrees on a fair, ambitious, and binding global climate treaty. Sara described her decision to begin the fast in a press release:

“I undertook this fast in solidarity with those who are suffering the effects of climate change, but also to show my dedication to the climate movement – to show that there is something that I care about more than myself, more than my own personal comfort and gratification.”

Sara and Anna continued their fast for 44 days. They broke it on Saturday morning, drinking juice together with two other long-term strikers at a cafe in Copenhagen. That afternoon I ran into Sara as I entered the Bella Center, where the night before delegates had forged a weak "politically binding" Copenhagen Accord. My mood was grim during much of that day, and my frustration with the shameful outcome of these talks continues. But I felt a new sense of hope after my brief conversation with Sara, who spoke with joy about her first meal since the fast started.

“We have decided to end this fast today because we know that we need to keep on working as climate activists for our whole lifetime," she said. "We will keep on pushing on our governments, harder and harder, until we see the necessary political shifts achieved and a global deal sealed.”

Chris DetjenSchool: University of Michigan- Ann Arbor (alumnus)
Areas of Study: Program in the Environment and Political Science

Chris Detjen is excited to join Expedition Copenhagen as an advisor on policy, campaigns, and strategic partnerships. He is a 2008 graduate of the University of Michigan--Ann Arbor, where he helped found the Michigan Student Sustainability Coalition. He currently works as Program Development Manager at the NextEnergy Center in Detroit, Michigan. At NextEnergy, Chris tracks and pursues public and private funding opportunities for renewable energy technology development. In addition to his funding development work, he serves as one of NextEnergy’s leads in analyzing and influencing energy policy. Previously, Chris interned at the German Energy Agency in Berlin, Germany and the Pew Environment Group in Washington, DC. He attended the COP 14 talks in Poznan, Poland last December through the SustainUS Agents of Change program.

YouTube Watch Chris's Interview
twitter Follow Chris on Twitter

Contribute

Donate Now

Charities Review Council

Charities Review Council
You can view our full profile at the Charities Review Council.


Featured Program

YEA! MNYEA! MN connects Twin Cities Metro youth to facilitate shared skills and strategies and take coordinated action on environmental sustainability.
More info...

eNewsletter Signup

* indicates required

Social Networking